Before the main sentence of our union clause or French

Before the main sentence of our union clause or French /How the Soviet Union tried to create an alternative to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Treaty :: Society This is precisely the kind of amazing profitability demonstrated by Bitcoin. Virtual currencies that have only been used for a few years behave in the same way as gold, the oldest financial instrument. Why does this happen, and what does it have to do with the global decline of traditional currencies, including the US dollar? By the way, this is not only the production of domestic products, but also the solution. The task is to establish a technological chain, from the use of Russian raw materials, components and production materials to final products and logistics.
The United States is depreciating. What values ​​will the current US economic and military machinery uphold? It can be said that it no longer forces the world towards democracy. We still need to find out exactly what she will force us to do. As for our interference in Belarusian internal politics, our only sin is that although we should interfere, we actually did not interfere.

The Kurgan region decided to take a free holiday-take a freight train to the Black Sea. And I had to go outside in a coal carriage. The criminal was arrested in Morozovsk in the Rostov region.
As the fire spread rapidly, thousands of people were evacuated urgently. The fire, which was named Apple, started at noon on Friday and lasted until the third day. The fire fighting involved about 1.3 thousand. Including the driver, 9 people died.
How would you rate your foreign language level? Do you wear a mask in shops and public transportation?

What will be the result of such a plan? What do Moscow, London and Paris think about this score? There is an opportunity to implement such an agreement, and a telegram decrypted by Soviet diplomats detailed the agreement. Moscow, in turn, was familiar with the British and French proposals, so it was able to establish its own version of the alliance agreement in the shortest time (literally, within a few days), which would guarantee the position of Eastern European countries and restrictionist countries, But at the same time, it will not infringe on the interests of the Soviet Union or harm the interests of the Soviet Union. Passive observation status in the West turned it into the main target of German aggression. This treaty has every opportunity to be successfully concluded. In theory, this can stop Hitler's ambitions and World War II. In modern Western historiography, the attitude towards the April 1940 incident is ambiguous. On the one hand, everything is blamed on the Soviet Union (). On the other hand, many people, especially many in the British academic circle, have publicly stated that London and Paris have fallen into their own plans and interests, and have destroyed the almost formed diplomatic structure with their own hands. But there is still a chance, and it can be realized according to the proposal and outline put forward by the Soviet government in April 1940. In the spring of 1940, the real initiative to establish an equal anti-Hitler alliance came from the Soviet Union. A few months later, only the incomprehensible actions of London and Paris led to a change in the pattern of European forces, which eventually forced Moscow and Germany to reach an agreement known as the "Ribbentrop Molotov Treaty." Chamberlain and the Daraday government should bear the full responsibility for this, and they rejected the Soviet proposal in an amazing way. Let's see how this happened. Anti-Soviet structure Generally speaking, by the spring of 1940, the political structure of Eastern Europe and Southeast Europe (the central part no longer existed-it was a major power of the Third Reich) developed as follows. On April 6, the Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs Baker (ó) arrived in London, aiming to obtain from the United Kingdom guarantees of Polish independence and inviolability of the borders. Lord Halifax replied orally that the Anglo-Polish agreement on military cooperation is expected to be formalized in the future. At the same time, Warsaw and Romania concluded a separate agreement on mutual assistance, which contains a standard statement that if a third country invades, the two parties must help each other. Moscow considers the agreement to be primarily anti-Soviet: Poland and Romania share a common border in the Carpathians and Galicia, so from a purely technical point of view, the Soviet Union formed from the Baltic to the Black Sea. In addition, it is still possible for Germany and Poland to unite or attract Germany and Poland to their own interests without direct military aggression. The Germans carried out an incredible diplomatic activity in Eastern Europe, trying to get all countries in the region to submit to its influence. In the Baltic states, propaganda to support German is also in full swing. The information received by the Soviet Union’s external intelligence is that under certain circumstances, Latvia and Estonia may give up their national independence and instead support the German protectorate (in Lithuania, the situation is more complicated). The UK is likely to receive the same information. London and Warsaw began to develop a plan for a joint landing in Liepaja, with the aim of occupying the Latvian port to prevent it from entering Germany and providing a base for the Polish fleet in the Baltic Sea. When this bizarre adventure failed, the British government would invite Marshal Riz Smigli to withdraw the modern ships of the Polish fleet from the Baltic Sea, but the Polish Minister of Defense refused. The adventurous Polish plan to seize the Latvian port in the spring of 1940 (Poland considers itself the main military power of Latvia) remains a mysterious and completely closed story. By the way, this is another reason why the current wave of pre-war documents requires special research. This is how the Soviet plenipotentiary Maysky described his dialogue with the diplomatic representative Lord Halifax immediately after Baker’s departure (Col. Joseph Baker, then the Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs, was Polish Minister of Foreign Affairs after Birzowski’s death. The proponent of the concept of leadership was also one of the initiators of the confiscation of the Seysin area) Czechoslovakia, after the Polish government fled from Warsaw in 1940, was imprisoned by Romanians and died in 1945 at the age of about 5.

Moscow explained that the existence of the detained Russians in the Belarusian sanatorium Plepin admitted that among the Belarusians detained in Donbass was a former colleague from Donbass.

It is said that this was with the active support of Estonia, and apparently with the connivance of the Latvian government, the German troops landed through the Latvian port. In modern history and political discussions, this kind of plot is almost completely forgotten or ignored. But in the spring of 1940, not only in Moscow but also in London, this possibility was seriously considered. Russian phobia and anti-Semitism are now customary to represent Latvia and Estonia as poor sheep, torn to pieces by the monsters of totalitarianism-Germany and the Soviet Union. But in fact, the regimes of these countries actively cooperated with Berlin at that time, which could end in anything. Moreover, if Germany launches an attack on the Soviet Union, it is said that the battlefield structure of military operations will also undergo a fundamental change. Poland’s position is for ideological reasons and categorically rejects any allied relations with the Soviet Union. Moreover, these are not only political in nature (fighting Bolshevism, etc.), because they are purely a reflection of the state. The Russians are dissatisfied with everything, and Poland's primitive anti-Semitism complements the Russians. Reported in the April 7th telegram: Even facing the threat of a full-scale war with Germany, the Poles continued to persuade London to implement the so-called Uganda plan, which is to reset millions of Polish Jews to the British part of tropical Africa. Imagine the Lodz tailor in the jungle of Uganda, the owner of Bialystok and the violinist in Warsaw. Even in the spring of 1940, it looked strange at least, and from a modern point of view, it was completely scary. Now in Poland, this view is spreading, which shows that the unwillingness to form an alliance with the Soviet Union or to allow part of the Red Army to enter Polish territory was a reflection of the Soviet-Polish war. At that time, the political commissar followed Tukhachevsky’s troops to Warsaw in the rear. , Sovietized Polish ethnic territory. ...The government led by Felix Dzerzhinsky did not participate. These committee members did some effort not only in Polish but also Russian. All this was accompanied by violence and murder, mainly involving Catholic priests. These facts are like this, and Isaac Babel described them beautifully in his book. It is speculated that this situation of the Jewish population in Warsaw was one of the reasons for the outbreak of anti-Semitism and reluctance to contact Poland between the two world wars. In general, in modern Poland, they liked this quasi-psychological reason very much for their behavior in the pre-war period. This excuse is very weak. Maisky wrote in a telegram on April 7: The position between Germany and the Soviet Union; Poles believe that the Red Army is not allowed to be stationed on their territory under any circumstances. " Looking to the future, we can say that the British government appreciated Poland’s strange position after the war. On July 26, 1945, the then British Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden sent a private letter to Alfred Duff Cooper, who was the special envoy of the French interim government at the time: although it was the first country to launch weapons against Hitler The right to enjoy a truly free and independent national life, but I believe this view runs counter to the historical facts about Poland. For the past 151 years, an independent or divided Poland has been an obstacle between Prussia and Russia, not an obstacle (Bonapat’s policy for many years). It was the friction between Russia and Poland that led to the failure of the 1940 attempt to win Russia over our support. Poland, with good relations with the Soviet Union, can become a strong, independent and prosperous country. Poland, which had poor relations with the Soviet Union, could become a threat to international peace and Britain. "(The news was obtained from a foreign site in the Soviet Union and is in the archive of). Steele ®-! Steele Vejos robot 1,000 euros.
Moscow proposed to sign a communiqué on mutual assistance when Germany launches aggression to ensure the safety of Poland and Romania. Subsequently, this situation began to be interpreted as an attempt to establish an anti-Hitler alliance. In fact, the proposal looks strange. When the text of the agreement proposed by Great Britain was drafted, it left an impression of Germany’s public aggression against the East, while Britain and France had no intelligible guarantees. No interaction mechanism has even been considered or agreed before. This is how Mysky described it in the same telegram on April 7: “Halifax invited me to his place today and familiarized me with the Anglo-Polish negotiations announced by Prime Minister Poland in Parliament today. (I believe TASS translated the statement, you have), and partly out of his initiative and partly in answer to my question, he made the following explanation: 1. Baker and Halifax in London At least there is no provisional agreement between them. The only document on which the two sides reached consensus is the public communiqué (announced by the Prime Minister's Office). It is planned to conclude a final mutual assistance bilateral treaty in the future, but Halifax cannot at least point out what it signed Approximate date.
The communiqué stated that the obligation of mutual assistance shall be effective by one of the parties. To explain this vague wording, I asked whether England is obliged to provide assistance to Poland automatically. For example, did Germany attack Lithuania and whether Poland would provide assistance to Lithuania? Or is Poland obliged to do the same thing, for example, Germany attacked the Netherlands, while England assisted the Netherlands? (The Netherlands at the time did not have any ally, and wanted to avoid participating in the common European problems in the same way as the First World War-about "it looks"). For this direct question, Halifax was unable to answer any definite questions, but noticed that this question should be clarified in the future. When I asked who the judge was, did Germany directly or indirectly threaten the independence of Poland or England through certain actions-whether it was only the Polish government or the British government-Halifax could not give me a clear answer. Obviously, this important issue was not clarified during the negotiations. "
The only difference is that the Germans and Bonnets (French foreign minister. Germans and traitors to France-about) were strongly anti-Soviet at first, even though they tried to communicate with the former Soviet envoy Jacob Surit. French charm and courteous speech solve this critical situation. In this regard, it is easier to communicate with the British, because they seem more candid and sincere in the context of Bonnet’s hypocrisy. The Soviet plenipotentiary Trit Suritte described his conversation with the head of the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs in a telegram from April 7 (the same day he met with Halifax and Meyski): In addition , Was on the plane approaching the cabinet member told me. Yes, he did not make any suggestions, nor did he fully formulate an alternative plan (at least the second plan), but he talked about these plans in a very vague form. He emphasized our own interest in helping Poland and Romania during the German attack. He even quoted some words about our position on the victims of aggression in Stalin's speech at the conference. Since naturally, I do not support the conversation and deliberately do not ask questions (even before I receive your special instructions, I can assure you that I will stick to this strategy), so much of the content is still vague. Hope we will take on the promise, and it may be Germany’s main blow (in Moscow, the phrase was emphasized with a pencil-approximately). Before leaving, I said very reluctantly that he will return to this topic in a few days, and hope that by then he can consider his considerations in the form of specific suggestions. When he found out to him. You think the purpose of all these conversations is just to provide support beyond the impression of consultation, intimate contact, etc. I don't even go to him now, even if it is not for current events. "After analyzing all these signals, the People’s Committee has already written a letter to Stalin on April 9, in which he suggested not to support any measures that imply unilateral commitments by the Soviet Union. And on April 12, he The following instructions were sent to: Bonnet, like in Czechoslovakia, is almost unwilling to help Poland, Romania or any other country in Eastern Europe. Through talking with us, he still seeks to get the opportunity to talk about the goal of our reluctance to help. Therefore , It is necessary to give him such an answer so that he cannot refer to them like September to justify his passive and subservient position. Therefore, this does not mean that we are obliged to make any specific suggestions or disclose our Stand in response to his vague suggestion."

The foundation of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is to develop practical positions, including on military issues, rather than issuing declarations without specific content. In addition, Poland's position (Romania's behavior is extremely passive, only escalating the situation through the words of the London ambassador Violer Thiel) cannot cover up any agreement that can be reached between the Soviet Union, Britain and France. Even if this is the will of London and Paris. At the same time, Moscow tried to join as many alliances as possible, including Turkey, while conducting intensive consultations with Turkey. In the end, it was the Soviet Union that had to take the initiative to formulate such a draft alliance agreement, which would exclude Moscow’s unilateral commitments and would not isolate the Soviet Union from a joint war from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea in the face of the unfinished pro-German alliance. on-line. Generally speaking, the People's Deputies Committee formulated the Soviet Union's response principles to Great Britain and France's proposals in 1940, and the Soviet counter-proposals will be based on this. The People’s Commissar sent a note to Stalin on the same evening for consideration (also to Molotov and for some reason Kaganovic was obviously a member of the Politburo, because Kaganovic was not directly involved in Soviet foreign policy. Development). The note reads: "We have received a proposal from the British government requesting us to unilaterally announce that France has made a more specific proposal to expand the Soviet-French mutual assistance treaty. The United Kingdom may not want to reach an agreement with us. The initiative is to investigate us through the French government. In any case, through such questions and suggestions, Britain and France still expressed their positions and aspirations. If we want to achieve from them, we must gradually show us We do not have to expect the other party to provide us with what we want. Finally, it is necessary to promote our wishes and explain them to the public. In the case of an aggression against one of these countries, the alliance created as a result of that country’s assistance to any European neighbors of the Soviet Union (this paragraph is different from the British proposal, that is, the unilateral declaration is replaced by a bilateral treaty, while in France In the proposal, the Baltic States and Finland are included in the possible victims of aggression)). 2. England, France and the Soviet Union pledged to provide assistance to the Soviet Union's European neighbors. "The first point in the original notes is drawn with the blue pencil usually used by Stalin. The wording and wording are much more complicated, and not just different from those proposed by Western countries. The People’s Committee stated this in brackets. Explanation. This complicated phrase hides several diplomatic meanings at once. First, it does not directly mention Poland and Romania (remember that Germany is planning to invade Latvia). However, it is understood that if Britain and France pass a bilateral mutual assistance treaty and These countries are bound (in fact, even though the Anglo-British treaty has not been formally signed, they are already bound), and Germany attacks them, then the Soviet Union will automatically enter the war instead of seeking more permission from Warsaw and Bucharest. That is It is said that the sequence of events is implicitly as follows: the Germans attacked Poland, then Britain and France declared war on Germany and actively entered Germany (without stopping), and the Soviet Union, loyal to the obligations of the allies, also participated in the war against Hitler. The British and French proposals adopted. Different chains: the Germans attacked someone in Eastern Europe, the Soviet Union should be the first to pray for the victims of aggression, and go all out. Western countries will consider this and consider whether to start a war with them, or it is best Waiting for further suggestions: The Soviet Union reached an agreement for a period of 5 to 11 years. The two sides have a common obligation to provide each other with various assistance including military assistance immediately when Europe invades any state party. 2. England, France and the Soviet Union promised to provide various assistance, including military assistance, to Eastern European countries between the Baltic Sea and the Black Sea and bordering the Soviet Union. 3. The United Kingdom, France and the Soviet Union promised to discuss and determine the scale and form of military assistance provided by these countries in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2. 4. The British government explained that the aid it provided to Poland meant an invasion of Germany entirely from outsiders (the Soviet government did not read the text of the Anglo-Polish Treaty, but later proved that the treaty had no words in both English and Polish, but Mentioned a European country, which can be interpreted as an anti-Soviet coalition-approx. 5. If an aggression is launched against Poland and Romania, the trade union treaty existing between Poland and Romania is declared effective or completely cancelled according to Soviet regulations 6. After the start of hostilities, England, France and the Soviet Union promised not to engage in any form of negotiation, nor to separate from the aggressor, and did not reach peace with the mutual consent of all three powers.

The corresponding agreement was signed at the same time as the convention and must be formulated in accordance with paragraph 3. 8. Recognize the need for Britain, France and the Soviet Union to conduct joint negotiations with Turkey on a special agreement on mutual assistance. "At first, these suggestions should be transmitted through the ambassadors of Great Britain and France in Moscow, with corresponding postscripts (crossed out) on these suggestions. But then, due to the importance and significance of this event, he ordered the document to be sent to London. Mysky and Paris sent to Surit so that they could pass the Soviet proposal to the governments of England and France. Two days later, on April 20, in Britain, Surites telegraphed to Moscow: "Except for my 5896. Our proposal left a deep impression on Bonnet. Once he was familiar with all our eight points, he retreated to the next room in order to call Daradia. I don’t need to give special explanations to the fourth and fifth points, because these points have nothing to do with France and obviously not particularly interested in Bonnet. However, regarding the fifth point, he even said so. All his interests are naturally connected with the first and second points. Second, he is obviously embarrassed to extend the coverage to the Baltic Sea. He didn't mind, but several times he asked which country this applies to. When reviewing the first point, he clearly pointed out with satisfaction that this is only related to Europe and does not apply to the Far East. Naturally, he did not, and of course he could not give other answers, but despite this, he still asks me to convey to you that he must admit that our project is. Do you think that in view of the seriousness of this matter, I request a meeting with Daladia? In order not to be offended, you can agree with him. "
In the UK, the synchronicity of actions was disrupted. Nevertheless, the text of the Soviet paper was handed over to the Seed Ambassador in Moscow, who forwarded it to London. Halifax managed to get acquainted with Maisky before it arrived, and has managed to issue additional instructions to the seed ambassador (ambassador), which Halifax understood as trade. This is the report on April 16th:
Halifax believes that the content of my message is not inconsistent with the above instructions of Sidders, so he will send the message consistently, adding that after drafting the message, he has received a message from the Soviet government. Halifax was interested in my opinion of his proposal, but I refused to express this opinion, referring to my lack of instructions on this matter. Halifax expressed the hope that he could get a reply from Moscow no later than the 18th, because this moment is very dangerous and must be acted (rapidly). Halifax naively believes that all parties to the agreement should cover Eastern Europe in a network of mutual assurance and mutual assistance. He believes that all Eastern European countries are very interested in this, and the mission of the major powers (Great Britain, France and the Soviet Union) is precisely to ensure the safety of current-limiting countries. This idea is inconsistent with reality, because Poland refused to accept any guarantee from the Soviet Union, Romania hesitated, and pro-German sentiments appeared every day in the Baltic Sea. The Finns in the Baltic Sea frowned and did not know what happened. In Hungary, they only Speaking a lot. Transylvania, associating it with return control. Yugoslavia is undergoing traditional chaos, and only the Greeks are still loyal supporters of the hopeless British army. They have not yet penetrated the Italian army into Albania, but they are already considering this issue. "2) I asked Halifax why the speed of providing guarantees to Romania was somewhat unexpected, because from our dialogue with Romania on April 12, I came to the conclusion that the matter is not so close. The guarantee will depend on the Warsaw report. Halifax replied that this was the case before, but the French government insisted at the last minute to provide the guarantee immediately. Since the guarantee issue was resolved in principle, the British government failed to To persuade the French government to postpone its actual implementation until later, the Prime Minister gave a speech yesterday.
I listed them, and I pointed out to him that this was a transmission of Comrade Stalin’s report at the conference) (officially Grzybowski did not deceive, but in fact these are just new papers, not restating Stalin’s pure form Report -). These views are consistent with Polish policy. Poland is also ready to provide assistance to countries at risk, take all necessary defensive measures, and so on. 2) There are pros and cons in the three Baltic countries. The first is that these countries are prepared to defend themselves. Poland intends to provide self-defense in these countries and avoid doing anything that would increase the difficulty of its position. The second one should include the propaganda carried out there (in response to my question about the norms, I answered that he was referring to German propaganda). If there is a tendency to abandon independence in one of these states, it will create a new situation for Poland, and the Polish ambassador will come to me with new instructions. "Surprisingly, but in April 1940, there were 201 German divisions hanging over Poland, still trying to conquer, if not the entire Baltic region, at least to conquer Lithuania and Latvia. There is no reasonable explanation for this behavior. In fact, Grzybowski suffered countless questions and clarifications, which caused Waltz to torture. Facts have proved that Warsaw believes that the situation in Latvia is very dangerous, and the alliance with Romania does not mean that Britain will join Latvia, and Baker himself It is believed that Hungary has not yet lost to the world. At the same time, the key issue (Germany's ultimatum to Poland) is as follows: You can post comments when logging in through any social network (social plug-in).
Why call our president stupidly? Has he at least done anything to him? Do not. I have reached an agreement with your Lithuania on everything about decoration and peace. He is a great man and a world-renowned outstanding peacekeeper. It turns out-both a mole and a mole, Lithuania.
Fool, you seem to know nothing about the various parts of the Federation, at least three of them? These committee members have made some efforts not only in Polish, but also in Russian. The Cousin Revolution and these committee members made some efforts not only in Polish, but also in Russian. The "Gorski" revolution with whom they became friends "together with the boss (banker) from the metropolis (Sefadic or Ashkinazi). To treat restricted hybrids as restricted hybrids, you don't need tedious calculations and tours. The current authorities need to take corresponding actions and take positive actions. that's it. You idiot, are you happy that your prosecutor is deceiving NATO soldiers? What is the relationship between your Nausa’s growth and his IQ? For many years, I always thought that her son died in the hospital, until he himself found her a spoonful of honey after dinner. The secret to a good sleep. -Regarding an accident, which location has better sleep?

Why arrest and wait for jokes about men and women? How to build a sentence in French 🏠 French sentence structure made easy